A STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL RETAILERS IN THE LIGHT OF INCREASED SHOPPING MALLS IN KERALA
March 31, 2026
STRENGTHENING EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING THROUGH ANGANWADI TEACHER PREPAREDNESS UNDER ICDS
March 31, 2026
A STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL RETAILERS IN THE LIGHT OF INCREASED SHOPPING MALLS IN KERALA
March 31, 2026
STRENGTHENING EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING THROUGH ANGANWADI TEACHER PREPAREDNESS UNDER ICDS
March 31, 2026

BEHAVIOURAL INFRASTRUCTURE TO FOSTER ORGANISATIONAL RESILIENCE: PERFORMANCE IN VIRTUAL, MANAGERIAL, AND PROJECT CONTEXTS

*Nikhil Ruben Prasad, & **Suchithra Devi, S.

*Doctoral Researcher, Department of Economics, SN College, Varkala, University of Kerala, India.

**Associate Professor and HOD, Department of Economics, SN College, Chempazhanthy, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

 

Abstract


Nudge theory posits that subtle alterations in choice architecture can predictably guide behaviour without restricting options or changing economic incentives (Thaler & Sunstein, 2008). This integrative review synthesises three complementary empirical studies to demonstrate how digital and behavioural nudges enhance organisational resilience across global virtual teams, managerial decision-making under risk and uncertainty, and large-scale project performance. Seeber et al. (2024) found that in 96 culturally diverse GVTs (N=235), both weekly digital reminder nudges (DRN) and team-based interventions (TBI) significantly boosted psychological safety, with TBI fully mediated by improved coordination quality and DRN exerting a direct effect. Renz et al. (2023), in a 3×2 experiment with 298 U.S. managers, showed that a simple pro-neutrality recommendation nudge delivered before or after initial decisions reliably reduced risk and uncertainty aversion by counteracting loss aversion, status-quo bias, and blame avoidance. Bukoye et al. (2022), drawing on interviews with project professionals, identified 21 nudge tools (defaults, feedback loops, social norms, framing, etc.) that help mitigate planning fallacy, decision paralysis, and coordination failures, thereby improving iron-triangle outcomes of time, cost, and quality. Collectively, these studies highlight three shared mechanisms salience, simplification, and social proof that operate through enhanced coordination, bias reduction, and behavioural alignment to deliver higher psychological safety, decision neutrality, and project performance. The paper advances an integrative framework that repositions nudges as scalable behavioural infrastructure, offering theoretical refinement and practical, low-cost toolkits for organisational leaders and project managers, while outlining directions for future multi-level, longitudinal, and AI-augmented research.

Keywords


nudges, digital reminder nudges, psychological safety, risk, uncertainty neutrality, project performance management, iron triangle, global virtual teams, and behavioural interventions.

 

References


Bukoye, O. T., Ejohwomu, O., Roehrich, J., & Too, J. (2022). Using nudges to realise project performance management. International Journal of Project Management, 40(8), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.007

Caraban, A., Karapanos, E., & Nunes, N. J. (2019). Nudge me, please: A systematic review of the effects of digital nudges. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300733

Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Donovan, K. H., & McAuliffe, S. (2020). Psychological safety interventions in healthcare: A systematic review. Journal of Healthcare Management, 65(6), 421–437.

Dusenberry, P., & Robinson, M. (2020). The impact of training on psychological safety: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(2), 145–168.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of organisational Psychology and organisational behaviour, 1, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183

Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.

Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451

Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk savvy: How to make good decisions. Viking.

Glikson, E., & Erez, M. (2020). The emergence of psychological safety in virtual teams: A multi-level examination. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1053–1081.

Hauser, O. P., Larrick, R. P., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2018). Nudging and the context-dependency of interventions. Organisational behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 146, 1–12.

Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organisation Science, 15(1), 38–54.

Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.

Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., & Peng, M. W. (2017). Managerial risk taking: A review and future directions. Journal of Management, 43(1), 137–169.

Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organisations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250

Johnson, E. J., Shu, S. B., Dellaert, B. G. C., Fox, C., Goldstein, D. G., Häubl, G., Larrick, R. P., Payne, J. W., Peters, E., Schkade, D., Wansink, B., & Weber, E. U. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23(2), 487–504.

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioural economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.

Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.

Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476.

Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535.

Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Reinig, B. A., & Briggs, R. O. (2009). Principles for effective virtual teamwork. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 113–117.

Pesämaa, O., Zwikael, O., & Huemann, M. (2018). Process-performance model in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 879–892.

Pollack, J., Biesenthal, C., Sankaran, S., & Clegg, S. (2018). Classics in project management: Using the iron triangle. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 1–5.

Renz, E., Müller, M. M., & Bohm, K. L. (2023). When nudges promote neutral behaviour: An experimental study of managerial decisions under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Business Economics, 93(8), 1310–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01139-7

Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.

Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59.

Seeber, I., Fleischmann, C., Cardon, P., & Aritz, J. (2024). Fostering psychological safety in global virtual teams: The role of team-based interventions and digital reminder nudges. Group Decision and Negotiation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-024-09899-5

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665.

Sunstein, C. R. (2019). On freedom. Princeton University Press.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.

Van Kleef, G. A., & Van Trijp, H. C. M. (2018). Nudging in the context of food choice: A review. Food Quality and Preference, 68, 1–12.

Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., & Teevan, J. (2021). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(1), 43–54.

Zavaleta Bernuy, A., et al. (2022). Email-based reminder nudges to reduce student procrastination. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), Article 1–25.

 

To cite this article


Nikhil Ruben Prasad, & Suchithra Devi, S. (2026). Behavioural Infrastructure to Foster Organisational Resilience: Performance in Virtual, Managerial, and Project Contexts. Sparkling International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Studies, 9(1), 7-20.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial