THE WILLPOWERSeptember 30, 2020
*Sheikh Saifullah Ahmed & ** Deb Proshad Halder
*Lecturer, Department of English and Modern Languages, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
**Lecturer, Department of English, Jashore Govt. Women’s College, Bangladesh.
This paper aims to delineate the stylistic richness and liberty prevalent in the texts of the poet, Wordsworth, which are rarely manifested by the contemporaries of Wordsworth grouped as the Romantics due to their distinct thematic and stylistic features. The paper, owing to its quality of content, affords to exhume the metrical discordances, socialized dictions laid by the poet in the body of the poems that the other romantics could not afford so abundantly. It intervenes with the hypothesis that the poetic style exercised by Wordsworth nears to the taste of social stylistic patterning of everyday usages rather than all other romantic poets in the light of poetic style and diction. It aims at interpreting and critically analyzing the content of the poems by Wordsworth and those by the other contemporaries. The study involves theoretical analysis and explanatory interpretation, that claims the development of the facts through researching archives of public libraries, courtrooms, and published academic journals. It is a qualitative content analysis-based research at which secondary data from secondary sources are incorporated. Thus, the paper culminates with the content analysis where it paves to show how distinctively Wordsworth creates the dictions of the poems in order to make them socially inclusive and make the style as free as a fountain that other romantics do not tread.
Diction, liberation, romantic, sociolect, style, wordsworth
Abrams, M.H (6th ed). (1993). The Norton Anthology of English Literature, (vol. 2). New York: W.W. Norton and Company Inc.
Behler, E. (1968). The Origins of the Romantic Literary Theory. Colloquia Germanica, 2, 109-126. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/23979800
Classic Poetry Series. (2004). William Wordsworth: Poems. Poemhunter.com- The World’s Poetry Archive. Retrieved from: https://www.poemhunter.com/i/ebooks/pdf/william_wordsworth_2004_9.pdf
Deniz, M. (2009). Importance of Language and Style in Romantic Poetry. Discover Literature, [BlogPost]. Retrieved from http://discoverliterature.blogspot.com/2013/05/importance-of-language-and-style-in.html
E.L. (May 7, 2019). How does Wordsworth Justify His low and rustic life in poetry? EnglishLiterature.net. Retrieved from https://englishliterature.net/notes/how-does-wordsworth-justify-his-lowand-rustic-life-in-poetry
Enlightenment and Romanticism Vocabulary List. (3rd March, 2020). Retrieved from http://facweb.stagnes.org/home/pmcfarlin/html/EnlightRomant%20Vocab%20World.html
Fischer, H. (2006). Romantic Verse Narrative: The History of a Genre. Cambridge University Press. New York.
Fruoco, J. (2017). Chaucer as a Sociolinguist: Understanding the Role of Language in Chaucer’s Internationalism. SALEM Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315728238_Chaucer_as_a_Sociolinguist_Understanding_the_Role_of_Language_in_Chaucer’s_Internationalism
Gelpi, A. (1992). Modern Philology, 89(4), 629-631. Retrieve from www.jstor.org/stable/438190
Guignery, V. (2009). Voices and Silences in the Contemporary Novels in English. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Joseph, J.E., (2004). T. C. Hodson and the Origins of British Socio-linguistics by John E. Joseph Sociolinguistics Symposium 15, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
Kirby-Smith, H. T. (1998). The Origins of Free Verse. University of Michigan Press. p. 44.
Kurland, D. (2002). Non-Verbal and Social Aspects of Language. Dan Kurland’s www.criticalreading.com : Reading and Writing Ideas As Well As Words. [BlogPost]. Retrieved from http://www.criticalreading.com/index.html
Miles, J. (1965). The Continuity of Poetic Language: The Primary Language of Poetry from 1540’s to 1940’s. University of California Press. Octagon Books. INC.175th Fifth Avenue. New York.
Parini, J. (2005). The Wadsworth Anthology of Poetry. Cengage Learning. p 655.
Pope, A. (2005). An Essay on Criticism. Critical Theory since Plato: Third Edition. Adams, Hazard and Searle, Leroy. Boston, Massachusetts. (297-306).
Rajasekar, S., Philominathan, P. and Chinnathambi, V. (2013). Research Methodology. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0601009.pdf
Redmen, L.V. and Mory, A.V.H. (2009). The Romance of Research. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co.
Riley, J. (2009). THE VOICE OF POETRY IS CALLING: Adrienne Rich’s Democratic Impulse. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 92(3/4), 347-364. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/41179252
Robinson, E. (1976). Charles, Shelley, and Byron: The Eagle and the Snake. London: John Hopkins University Press.
Romaine, S. (1994). Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Great Clarendon Street, UK.
Shaghi, A.M., and Ali, M. (2016). Simplified Course book of Research Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/24564964. Simplified Course Book of Research Methodology _By_Dr_Shaghi_2015-2016.
Shaw, R.B. (2007). Blank Verse: A Guide to its History and Use. Ohio University Press. Ohio, USA.
Teleky, R. (2001). Entering the Silence: Voice, Ethnicity, and the Pedagogy of Creative Writing. MELUS, 26(1), 205-219. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/3185503
Thompson, V. (2019). What Are the Characteristics of Conversation Poems? The Pen & Pad. [BlogPost]. Retrieved from https://penandthepad.com/characteristics-conversation-poems22871.html
Wordsworth, J. (2017). The Romantic Imagination. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165396.ch48
Wordsworth, W. (1800). Preface to Lyrical Ballads. The Harvard Classics-1909-14. Bartleby.com. Retrieved from https://www.bartleby.com/39/36.html
Golban, Petru. (2012). The Romantic Critical Thinking: Theoretical Incoherence of a Unitary Movement. 3.10.5901/mjss. 2012.03.01.127.
To cite this article
Sheikh Saifullah Ahmed, & Deb Proshad Halder. (2020). The Sociolinguistic Perspectives of the Stylistic Liberation of Wordsworth. Sparkling International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Studies, 3(3), 1-13.